Solidarity for the Few

By Jacqueline S. Homan, author: Classism For Dimwits and Divine Right

This movement struck me as being centered on young middle class white males, and they’re not welcoming or receptive of older people — including older people who have a lifetime’s worth of experience and battle scars from fighting the oppression created by unearned privilege. And according to Reena Walker, a seasoned older black woman and veteran activist, male privilege and how it is used by men in the 99% to beat women down and oppress us is ignored or rationalized by a busload of mansplaining. As a black woman who suffered a lifetime of poverty, sexism, racism and misogyny, Ms. Walker is hardly one of the 1% and yet the way she and other women are being treated at OWS sends the message that women (who make up 51% of the 99%) aren’t viewed as being human enough for harm against us to matter. Funny how freedom and economic justice is only for a few which usually does not include women. Some 99%ers are more equal than others.

It is no accident that women comprise over 70% of those living below poverty worldwide. The status quo of local and global capitalism depends on women’s unpaid/under-paid work. It could not survive without women’s unpaid work as primary caregivers, the childbearers, and the child-raisers. Capitalism is patriarchal to the core. The poorest of the world’s poor are women who also do upwards of two-thirds of the world’s work and own only 1% of the means of production and reproduction. Women hold up half the sky on our unpaid/under-paid backs.

Despite all of the claims by Occupy facilitators that rapes are not occurring at the Occupy Toronto camp at St. James Park, a few men from the Aboriginal community who are staying in the camp full time say otherwise. One of those men, identifying himself only as “Davine”, who is half Blackfoot and half Arab, said that the camp’s marshals have not been able to minimize or prevent sexual assaults on the women there and that “these [white] people are coming to us Natives for help.” What is really tragic in all this is that one of those Natives — Jayson Fleury — is a real opportunistic shmuck and sociopathic grifter who has ripped off poor and marginal women to support his lifestyle of partying across Canada 3-4 times a year. And he is one of a tiny handful of men who is willing to protect the women from rape. How sad is that?

What is supposed to be a movement about unity of the masses against the 1% is really looking more like the same ol’ same ol’: freedom and economic justice and a bigger slice of the pie for men; rape, invalidation, exploitation, abuse, oppression and discrimination against the poorest and most downtrodden victims of capitalism — poor women of ALL races. Somehow, I don’t find that very unifying, uplifting, or liberating as a poor and marginal woman.

And please don’t tell me that women’s human rights — including the right to a job with dignity, the right to an education, the right to food, housing, and healthcare, and the right to reproductive/sexual enfranchisement and bodily autonomy/self-determination, and most important of all, the right to NOT be raped and impregnated against our will at peril to our health, well-being, liberty, and lives — is less important that “the big picture” of those traditionally privileged members of the 99% getting their justice at poor and destitute women’s expense in the name of “social justice.” Sorry, but I’m not down with that.

As a woman from deep poverty who suffered more under capitalism than poor men due to institutionalized sexism, misogyny, and the social acceptance of patriarchy and its culture of rape, I have no interest in “taking one for the team” for the sake of the 99% movement (which is looking more like a Rapists’ Rights bowel movement) just so men can get a bigger slice of the economic pie while nothing changes for the better for women, especially poor and marginal women of all races.

Since colonization of North America, women in the US and Canada have been told to wait until after the men got all the more important issues resolved and then we women would eventually get our turn. But our turn never came — at least not for those of us in extreme poverty that never got to make it to even the lowest rung of the middle class. But then this Occupy movement has never been about us, has it?

A glaring example is the Occupy Vancouver list of demands included a call for the legalization of prostitution. Prostitution is rich white male-centered. It exists because capitalism is patriarchal and there’s a direct link between that and human trafficking and rape. Also at the crux of it is the larger societal view of women as non-persons, as cheap commodities that exist solely for male self-gratification.  These issues cannot be bifurcated.

Desperation, poverty, abuse, addiction, job and pay discrimination, lack of opportunities and a need to pay the rent and feed the kids, a history of colonialism, racism, sexism, and a misogynistic culture that devalues women and reduces us to disposable products to be bought and sold — all act in synergy to create a society where prostitution and sex trafficking exists and flourishes with men being the prime beneficiaries of it while women are further victimized.

What kind of social justice movement seeking to rectify the injustices of capitalism and the inclusion of women in the name of solidarity is this, anyway?

Why is the response to the rapes, the abuse, the exploitation, the trauma and the deaths that many poor and marginal women suffer as a result of being prostituted to simply treat this as “just another job”? What other job demands that the worker be raped, impregnated against their will, infected with an STD, violated, abused, and maybe even murdered? What kind of person supports that this sort of treatment should be legitimized? What kind of person seeking solidarity with women — especially poor and marginal women — would agree that women’s bodies should just be another disposable commodity available for purchase by men and that every woman should be OK with that?

Women need to be safe, but how safe are women when we’re not even viewed as full human beings? Yes, prostituted women deserve rights. But they also deserve to have real choices. Why would anyone think that johns will provide equitable treatment and respect for women? No man who thinks he has the right to trade in human flesh or take a woman against her will is a man who believes in real equality. A man who can do this is a man who doesn’t see women as being human enough for harm against us to matter. We should not have to accept and legalize exploitation and oppression from men in order to decriminalize the women being prostituted in the name of “unity.”

Legalized prostitution neatly sweeps under the wraps the insidious human rights catastrophe of the global human/sex trafficking industry. Women ensnared in that are literally forced into brutal sex slavery; bought and sold, beaten and raped over and over and over. Approximately 80% of those trafficked are women and girls. The average age of a trafficking victim is 14. The average life span once trafficked is 4 years. The victims usually die from HIV/AIDS related complications after being forced (often violently) to give unprotected sex to their male purchasers. Legalizing and sugar-coating the exploitation of women does not protect our human rights. It undermines them.

A genuine unity and people’s movement doesn’t consider women’s suffering irrelevant, or as a trivial “special interest”, or as titillating grist. Nor does it function as a microcosm of this capitalist economy with men competing for all the power, wealth, and status at the top while women serve as mere cheerleaders and poster children only to be trotted out for the convenience and benefit of male privilege.

Women deserve safety and decriminalized from doing what they have to do in order to survive, but women also deserve to have real options. As 51% of the population, women should be 51% represented in all mainstream jobs, instead of being herded into pink collar-ghettos, and the sub-poverty glass ceiling of Wal-Mart with the exploitative sex industry as the only other option available for poor women for whom college and grad school is as out of reach as a day trip to Sedna while male high school drop-outs and ex-felons get all the good-paying blue-collar union jobs in the skilled trades and all of the opportunities and hope for a better life that goes with that at the expense of women’s exclusion.

Women make up more than half of the 99%. Where is our liberation from male oppression and domination through rape, “honor killing”, FGM, hiring and pay discrimination, sexual and reproductive slavery, human trafficking, sexual exploitation, and domestic violence which are the all too common realities of women’s lives every day?  These are the realities that are disproportionally inflicted on poor and marginal women by men in the 99%. Yet these are all dismissed as “special interest issues” that are accepted as part of “the price of being born female”, which is why anti-oppression is needed.  And that is why a movement of unity for real social and economic change must be willing to accept constructive criticism and not get offended when male privilege is challenged.

What is uplifting, unifying, or liberating about Occupy camp facilitators designating untrained peers as “marshals” to serve as the “sexual assault response team” to deal with the rapes — not by offering rape kits that include emergency contraception and STD testing/treatment, and the arrest/removal of the rapist, but by counseling (read: pressuring) the women who’ve been raped against going to the police? (Not that the criminal justice system has ever been any panacea for women, especially rape victims — police, lawyers, and judges are products of the same patriarchal, misogynist, fetid capitalist sepulcher that has always oppressed and abused women through unearned male privilege at women’s expense. )

I have no interest in being ill-used and thrown under the bus for the sake of “solidarity” with fauxgressives just so that men can get justice while nothing changes for the better for poor women of all races.

If destitute and marginal women of all races are at these camps, it is because this shit is real for us. We have been the most oppressed, the most excluded, the most downtrodden, and the most harmed by the inherent injustices of capitalism which is inherently a gender war. Chronically poor and marginal women don’t have the safety nets that young working class and middle class white males have: the freedom from potentially life-threatening unwanted pregnancy, or the privilege of a job and/or families with resources to return to at the end of all this.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Solidarity for the Few”

  1. Michael J. McFadden Says:

    Jacqueline, thank you for the thoughts and insights on what’s going on with the Occupy folks. I’ve been pretty concerned about them since the start: there was a lot of experience, training, and hard work that went into the movements in the 70s, and I don’t think there are enough dedicated and well-trained people out there today to support what they are attempting on such a wide scale.

    I’m surprised and saddened to hear of the amount of problems for women at the sites. Unfortunately those and other problems will probably get used against the movement as a whole as the “powers-that-be” use them to justify a “clean-up” that the general public will then swallow as “necessary.”


  2. Leslie Says:

    Jacqueline, I spun off your insightful article here for a letter to Occupy Los Angeles. Please email me if you’d like a copy.

  3. lkj Says:

    It is really no wonder that the problems that exist in society as a whole manifest in these urban encampments. Many people are there for many different reasons and it is next to impossible to control in my experience. Unfortunately rape happens everywhere. I don’t think the fact that it happens is a reason to write off the whole movement. Women can barely get help when they are raped in the world outside the Occupy movement let alone inside that world. As a woman, and someone who has done prison solidarity work and known women from the Association for the Safety of Prostitutes I support the decriminalization of prostitution. Decriminalization would reduce the victimization that women who work in the sex trade experience with the added assault of the injustice system including rapes and discrimination by police. Vancouver has a very active, women run sex workers rights movement. I highly doubt that the Occupy Vancouver demand for the decriminalization of prostitution is motivated by male desire to sexually exploit women, after all, criminalization increases the exploitability of women. Unfortunately in this capitalist society we just don’t learn a lot of important social skills that are needed in order create a functioning community – we have institutions that are supposed to do that for us, and surely they just reinforce oppressive structures. In my own experience women are not that much better at creating community, the possibility of a women’s movement itself is rift by classism, racism, even violence. I have been personally physically attacked on the job in the context of a women’s worker co-op and sexually assaulted by women (w/in gay relationships). Yes we are victims of patriarchy, and as victims we carry trauma just like working class people, those subject to racism and colonial history. It’s humbling to try to get past all this legacy of fucked upness, I feel for people who are camping out, trying to confront our governments with really important issues and trying to make a functioning community at the same time. I don’t want to erase the positive and wise voices by only focussing on the problems, the problems are always there, the good stuff pretty hard to come by….

    • Jacqueline S. Homan Says:

      You don’t have to legalize male oppression and exploitation of women in order to decriminalize the women being prostituted. Like I said before, women deserve REAL equal opportunities. Reducing women to commodities that can be bought or sold, raped or murdered at the purchaser’s pleasure does women NO favors.

      I also don’t agree that these Occupiers are really confronting governments. I think it’s a counterfeit revolution to quell the possibility of a real one. If they really wanted to take down the 1% and confront the system, they would be occupying the Interstates to shut down trade and commerce, which would hit the 1% in the wallet. And they’d be occupying all the vacant foreclosed homes and putting real poor and homeless people in those homes, not turning them into off-campus frat houses for partying it up.

  4. No-hawk occupation of Toronto | Taiaiako'n Historical Preservation Society Says:

    […] Solidarity For The Few […]

  5. Amanda Says:

    Excellent summary of male oppression. I was a prostitute many moons ago. I ran away from home to a big city after being abused @ home. I tried to get a regular job but could not. I love the way people (men) call it “sex work.” I was raped at a brothel. My drug abuse got worse…my self esteem plummeted. I hated men and the world. (I STILL hate men). I am a radical feminist. My experiences being a prostitute were harrowing. Men of ALL walks of life hired me and made me disgusted with men and their “dirty little secrets.” Recently I realized that I was being paid to get raped. Today I am free of all of that and have affordable housing-a real “job”-higher self esteem etc..but the memories still haunt me. They will never go away completely. I feel scarred for life but with therapy I have healed a great deal. Prostitution should NOT be legal. That’s saying it’s ok to pay women to be raped over and over and over…….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: